BLOG & NEWS
Why does near-miss reporting matter for slips?
Why does near-miss reporting matter for slips? Because a near miss can reveal a slip risk before someone is injured and a claim is made. Reporting near misses gives facilities and safety teams information they can use to identify patterns, investigate causes and improve controls.
A near miss is not simply an incident that did not matter. It can be an early warning that something about the floor, environment, maintenance or working practices needs attention.
Why are near misses important if nobody was injured?
A slip does not have to result in an injury before it becomes useful information.
Someone may lose their footing without falling. A member of staff may notice that an entrance becomes slippery after rain. A guest may report almost slipping in the same area where another concern has already been raised.
None of these events may result in a claim.
That does not mean the underlying risk has disappeared.
For a facilities manager, the value of near-miss reporting is that it creates visibility. Without reporting, recurring problems can remain hidden until an incident causes harm.
This is particularly important across multi-site hospitality estates. A pattern that looks insignificant at one site may become much clearer when similar reports are reviewed across several locations.
What can a near miss tell you about slip risk?
A near miss can help you identify where and when a slip risk is occurring.
It can also provide clues about what is causing it.
The CHIMES framework provides a useful way to investigate those clues:
- Contamination: Was there water, grease, food, dust or another substance on the surface?
- Heel: Was the footwear appropriate, and how did the foot interact with the floor?
- Individual: Were movement, behaviour or awareness factors relevant?
- Maintenance: Had the area been cleaned correctly, and were the right products and methods being used?
- Environment: Were lighting, gradients, entrances, weather ingress or other environmental factors involved?
- Surface: Does the floor itself have adequate measured slip resistance?
The point is not to blame the person who nearly slipped.
It is to understand what conditions were present and whether the organisation could control them.
A near miss may therefore tell you much more than simply where someone nearly fell. It can point towards an underlying grip problem or another condition contributing to slip risk.
Why should near misses be investigated rather than just recorded?
Recording a near miss is only the first step.
If the same location generates repeated reports but nothing changes, the reporting process is not doing its job effectively.
The information needs to lead to a useful investigation.
For example, suppose several near misses are reported around a hotel entrance during wet weather. The reports may initially suggest that people are simply bringing water into the building.
A closer investigation could ask whether the entrance design, contamination control, cleaning process or floor surface is contributing to the problem.
That distinction matters.
Putting down a mat or displaying a warning sign may feel like action. However, these measures do not necessarily address the underlying condition.
The better question is: what is causing the risk, and what can be done to control it?
Does near-miss reporting prove that you are managing slip risk?
No. Reporting near misses is useful evidence, but reporting alone does not mean the risk has been adequately controlled.
The same principle applies to floor testing.
A test result does not automatically make an organisation compliant or prove that every aspect of slip risk has been managed correctly.
The better approach is to measure, improve and prove.
Measurement gives you information about the condition of the floor. Improvement means acting on what the evidence tells you. Proving means keeping appropriate records and checking that the controls continue to work.
Near-miss reporting fits into this process because it provides another source of information about what is happening in real-world conditions.
The goal is not to collect more forms.
The goal is to identify risks early enough to do something useful about them.
What should you do when a near miss is reported?
Start by recording enough information to understand the event.
Useful details can include:
- Where did the near miss happen?
- What was the floor condition?
- Was there water, grease, food or another contaminant?
- What were the environmental conditions?
- What cleaning or maintenance had taken place?
- Has a similar near miss or incident happened before?
- What action was taken afterwards?
Then look for patterns.
One isolated report may require investigation. Several reports involving the same location, floor or set of conditions provide a stronger reason to examine the underlying risk.
For multi-site organisations, it is also useful to compare information between locations. Consistent reporting can help facilities teams identify whether a problem is isolated or part of a wider pattern.
The important thing is to move from reporting to action.
If the evidence suggests a floor may be contributing to the risk, consider whether it should be objectively tested rather than relying on how it looks.
What does good near-miss reporting look like?
Good near-miss reporting is simple enough that people will actually use it.
Staff should understand what counts as a near miss and know how to report one. Reports should contain enough information to support an investigation.
Most importantly, people should see that reports lead to action.
If employees repeatedly report a slippery area and nothing changes, they may stop reporting. That removes an important source of information about the condition of the site.
A stronger approach treats near misses as opportunities to learn.
The organisation records the event, investigates the contributing factors, addresses the underlying problem where appropriate and checks whether the situation improves.
This creates a cycle of continuous risk management rather than waiting for an injury to provide the warning.
What to do about it
Review your recent slip incidents and near misses across your sites.
Look for recurring locations, floor types, contaminants, weather conditions, cleaning issues or other patterns. Then ask whether you have objective evidence about the condition of the floors involved.
If you are relying mainly on visual checks, cleaning records or warning signs, consider whether measuring floor grip would give you a clearer understanding of the risk.
The aim is not simply to prove that you have carried out checks.
It is to understand the risk well enough to improve it.
Take the next step
The Slip Risk Scorecard can help you identify potential gaps in your current approach to slip risk. If your assessment highlights a floor that needs closer investigation, a professional slip test can provide objective information about its measured slip resistance and help you decide what action may be appropriate.
Related questions
- Can you defend a slip claim?
- What evidence do you need to defend a slip claim?
- How do slip incidents affect your insurance premiums?
- How do you measure floor slip resistance?