BLOG & NEWS
What evidence do you need to defend a slip claim?
What evidence do you need to defend a slip claim? The evidence will depend on the circumstances, but it can include accident reports, photographs, CCTV, witness statements, risk assessments, cleaning records, maintenance records, previous incident records and evidence about the condition of the floor. The strongest position is usually supported by records that show the risk was identified, controlled and reviewed before the incident occurred.
Why does the evidence matter?
When a slip claim is made, the question is not simply whether a wet floor sign was present.
You need to understand what happened, what conditions existed at the time and what the organisation had done to manage the risk.
For a facilities manager, this means having evidence that reflects what actually happened at the site. A collection of documents created after an incident is not the same as an established system for identifying and controlling slip risk.
The evidence should help build a clear picture of the risk, the controls in place and the actions taken.
What types of evidence can help with a slip claim?
There is no single document that automatically proves an organisation was not responsible for a slip. Different evidence may be relevant depending on the circumstances.
Useful records can include:
- Incident reports: Details of when, where and how the incident occurred.
- Photographs: Images of the location and floor condition can help establish what the area looked like.
- CCTV: Where available, footage may help establish what happened immediately before and during an incident.
- Witness statements: Accounts from people who saw the incident or the conditions at the time.
- Risk assessments: Records showing that relevant slip and trip risks were identified and assessed.
- Cleaning records: Evidence of cleaning routines, products used and when an area was cleaned.
- Maintenance records: Information about repairs, defects and actions taken to maintain the premises.
- Previous incident and near-miss records: These can help identify whether similar problems had been reported before.
- Floor testing records: Where slip resistance has been measured, the results can provide objective information about the condition of the surface.
The Civil Procedure Rules’ Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims identifies documents that can be relevant in claims involving slips and trips. These include CCTV, photographs, risk assessments, accident reports, cleaning records, records concerning substances on floors, maintenance records and records of previous or similar accidents.
The precise evidence required will depend on the individual claim, so businesses should seek appropriate legal advice when responding to a claim.
Does a wet floor sign help defend a slip claim?
A wet floor sign can be part of a risk control system, but it does not prove that the underlying risk was adequately controlled.
A sign tells people that a potential hazard exists. It does not remove contamination from a floor or improve the floor’s slip resistance.
This is important because it is easy to confuse taking an action with controlling a hazard.
The same applies to cleaning.
A cleaning record can be useful evidence of what was done. However, the existence of a cleaning schedule does not automatically establish that the floor was safe at the time of an incident.
The more useful question is whether the control was appropriate for the actual conditions.
Does testing a floor prove you can defend a claim?
No. A floor test is evidence, but it is not a guarantee that a claim can be defended.
This distinction is important.
Testing tells you something about the floor’s measured slip resistance under the conditions tested. It can provide objective information that visual inspection cannot.
But measure, improve, prove is more useful than simply testing and keeping the result in a file.
If testing identifies a problem, the next step should be to understand why the floor is performing that way and what can be done to improve it.
The Slipology Method provides a framework for this:
Assess: Measure the real risk with pendulum testing.
Amend: Address the floor or conditions creating the risk.
Advocate: Get the relevant people involved and build understanding around the controls.
Assure: Maintain the required level of grip through appropriate cleaning and checks.
Affirm: Use evidence and data to demonstrate the result.
This moves the focus away from having a test certificate and towards actually managing the risk.
What should your records show?
Good records should tell a coherent story.
Imagine a guest slips in a hotel entrance after heavy rain. A useful record should help establish what happened at that location and what the organisation had done to manage foreseeable risks in that area.
That might include the risk assessment, information about the entrance flooring, cleaning procedures, records of previous incidents or near misses, relevant maintenance records and any available evidence about the conditions at the time.
This is much more useful than simply being able to say, “We have a risk assessment.”
The question is whether the evidence demonstrates that the assessment reflected the real conditions and that appropriate controls were actually being applied.
For multi-site hospitality organisations, consistency is particularly important.
If each site records and manages slip risk differently, it becomes harder to understand where the real weaknesses are. A consistent approach gives facilities teams better visibility across the estate.
What if you have very little evidence?
Do not try to recreate records simply to make the file look complete.
Preserve whatever legitimate evidence is available and seek appropriate legal advice about the claim.
Then use the situation as an opportunity to review the wider risk management process.
Ask where your current records are strong and where they are weak. Look at incident and near-miss reporting. Review cleaning and maintenance records. Consider whether important floors have ever been objectively tested.
A gap in your evidence can also reveal a gap in your risk management.
That is useful information, even if it is uncomfortable to discover.
What to do about it
Start by reviewing one high-footfall area at your site.
Check whether you could establish what happened there if a slip occurred tomorrow. Look for evidence covering the floor condition, contamination, cleaning, maintenance, previous incidents and near misses.
Then ask a more fundamental question: do you know the measured slip resistance of the floor?
If the answer is no, you may be relying on appearance and assumptions rather than objective information.
The aim is not to create paperwork for its own sake. It is to build a practical system that identifies risks, improves them and provides evidence of what has been done.
Take the next step
Use the Slip Risk Scorecard to identify potential gaps in your current approach. If the assessment highlights floors that need closer investigation, consider a professional slip test to obtain objective information about their slip resistance.
Related questions
- Can you defend a slip claim?
- Why does near-miss reporting matter for slips?
- How slip incidents affect your insurance premiums?
- How do you measure floor slip resistance?