BLOG & NEWS
How slip incidents affect your insurance premiums
Slip incidents can affect the cost and terms of business insurance because claims form part of the risk profile insurers assess. However, there is no universal rule that one slip claim automatically causes a premium increase. Insurance premium impact means the potential effect that an organisation’s claims history and assessed risk can have on the price and terms of its insurance.
Why should a facilities manager care about slip incidents and insurance?
If you manage a hotel, restaurant, leisure venue or hospitality estate, a slip incident can quickly become more than an operational issue.
There may be an injured employee or guest, an investigation, a compensation claim, disruption to the site and questions about how the risk was being managed. Liability insurance exists to help businesses deal with compensation claims arising from matters such as personal injury and property damage.
The old approach is simple: deal with the problem if a claim happens.
That can make prevention look like another facilities cost. But the better question is whether you are investing in controlling the underlying risk before an incident occurs.
For a facilities manager, that means looking beyond signs, cleaning schedules and incident reports. It means understanding whether the floors themselves provide enough grip in the conditions where people actually walk.
How slip incidents affect your insurance premiums
A slip incident does not automatically mean your insurance premium will increase by a particular amount.
Insurance pricing depends on the policy, insurer, claims history, risk profile and other factors. Your insurer may also consider the nature and frequency of previous claims when assessing the risk presented by the business.
That makes it important to separate two ideas.
A claim is an event. Risk management is the process of reducing the likelihood and consequences of future events.
If a hospitality business experiences repeated slip incidents, the claims history may become part of a wider picture about the organisation’s risk. An insurer may want to understand what caused the incidents and what has been done to prevent recurrence.
This is why simply paying a claim and moving on is a weak long-term strategy.
A claim may be handled through insurance, but the underlying floor condition has not necessarily changed.
What do insurers need to know after a slip incident?
When a slip happens, the incident itself is only part of the story.
The organisation may need to demonstrate how it identified and managed the relevant risk. HSE guidance makes clear that employers have responsibilities to assess workplace risks and take reasonably practicable measures to protect people.
For a facilities manager, useful questions include:
- Where did the incident happen?
- What was the floor condition at the time?
- Was there contamination such as water, grease or food?
- What footwear was being used?
- What cleaning process had been followed?
- Was the area affected by weather or water ingress?
- Had similar incidents or near misses occurred?
- Was the floor’s slip resistance actually measured?
- What corrective action was taken afterwards?
The last two questions matter particularly when trying to understand whether an incident was isolated or whether it points towards a wider grip problem.
A clean incident report tells you what happened. A proper investigation should also help you understand why it happened.
Could repeated slip claims make a business look riskier?
Potentially, yes.
An insurer is assessing risk, not simply counting individual accidents. Repeated claims can indicate that an underlying hazard may not have been adequately controlled.
That does not mean a facilities manager should try to avoid reporting incidents or claims. It means the opposite. Incidents should be managed properly, investigated and used to improve risk controls.
The aim is not to make your claims history look better.
The aim is to make the underlying risk better.
This distinction is important in hospitality because the same floor may be exposed to different conditions throughout the day. A restaurant entrance may experience rainwater in the morning, food contamination during service and intensive cleaning later in the day.
A floor that looks safe during a routine inspection may behave differently when conditions change.
That is where measuring grip becomes useful.
What is the connection between floor grip and slip risk?
Grip is the interaction between a person’s footwear and the walking surface under particular conditions.
It is not something you can reliably judge just by looking at a floor.
A surface can look clean and dry while still presenting insufficient slip resistance. Conversely, a floor that looks slightly worn may not necessarily be the highest-risk surface in the building.
This is why Slip Safety Services uses pendulum testing to measure floor slip resistance.
The Slipology Method provides a practical way to move from an incident or concern towards better control:
1. Assess
Measure the floor rather than relying on appearance or assumptions.
The HSE-recognised pendulum test provides a way of assessing slip resistance under controlled conditions.
2. Amend
If testing identifies a problem, address the floor or conditions creating the risk.
The objective is to deal with the cause rather than relying solely on measures such as warning signs.
3. Advocate
Make sure the people responsible for the building understand why the controls matter.
This includes facilities teams, cleaning teams, contractors and operational staff.
4. Assure
Maintain the conditions that keep the floor performing properly.
Cleaning methods, products, frequency and contamination control all matter.
5. Affirm
Use data to demonstrate what has changed.
This creates a clearer record than simply saying that a floor “looks safer”.
Why are signs and cleaning not enough on their own?
Wet floor signs have an important role. So does effective cleaning.
But neither automatically fixes poor floor grip.
A sign warns people that a hazard may be present. It does not change the slip resistance of the surface.
Cleaning removes contamination. It does not necessarily correct a floor that has inadequate slip resistance.
In fact, maintenance itself needs to be considered carefully. Cleaning products, methods and frequency form part of the conditions affecting slip risk.
The CHIMES model provides a useful diagnostic lens:
- Contamination: water, grease, food and other substances.
- Heel: how footwear interacts with the surface.
- Individual: the person, their movement and awareness.
- Maintenance: cleaning methods, products and frequency.
- Environment: lighting, gradients, entrances and weather.
- Surface: the floor itself and its measured slip resistance.
This gives a facilities manager a broader view of what may be contributing to incidents.
The important point is that the floor should not be treated as an unknown variable.
Is preventing slip incidents a better investment than dealing with claims?
Prevention should be viewed as an investment in controlling risk, rather than simply another line in the maintenance budget.
There are obvious costs associated with incidents. These can include injury, investigation, administration, disruption and claims. HSE’s assessment of the costs of workplace injuries includes financial costs such as compensation, legal and administrative costs, as well as employer costs associated with work reorganisation and absence.
Insurance can help transfer some financial consequences of covered claims. It does not remove the operational problem that caused the incident.
That is why the facilities manager’s objective should not be “how do we deal with the next claim?”
It should be “how do we reduce the likelihood of the next incident?”
Slip Safety Services has found a 57%+ average reduction in slip incidents across 4,000+ sites. The result is presented as evidence of what can happen when organisations move from reactive responses towards systematic slip risk control.
The lesson is not that every organisation will achieve the same result.
The lesson is that measuring and addressing the underlying risk gives facilities teams something they can actually manage.
What should a hospitality facilities manager do before the next claim?
Start with the areas where the consequences of a slip could be greatest.
Look at entrances, kitchens, bars, washrooms, changing areas, pool surrounds and other locations where water or contamination may be present.
Then ask whether your current controls give you evidence or assumptions.
A practical review could include:
- Reviewing recent slip incidents and near misses.
- Identifying recurring locations or floor types.
- Reviewing cleaning methods and products.
- Checking whether contamination is being controlled at source.
- Measuring floor slip resistance where risk warrants it.
- Recording the results and corrective actions.
- Establishing a consistent standard across sites.
For multi-site hospitality organisations, consistency matters.
One site may have excellent controls while another relies on informal checks. Without measurement and documented standards, it can be difficult to see that difference.
The goal is not more paperwork.
The goal is better visibility of the risk.
What good looks like
A well-controlled hospitality estate does not rely on someone saying that the floor “seems fine”.
It has measured floors where appropriate, consistent standards between sites and clear maintenance controls.
Teams understand what they are checking and why.
Incidents and near misses are investigated for underlying causes.
Most importantly, decisions about floor safety are based on evidence rather than waiting for another claim to provide the warning.
That is the shift from reactive risk management to prevention.
Conclusion
A slip incident does not automatically increase an insurance premium, but claims can form part of the wider risk picture an insurer considers. Waiting for a claim before addressing the underlying hazard leaves the business reacting to an event instead of managing the risk.
The better belief is simple: prevention is an investment, and you cannot manage floor grip properly until you measure it.
Take the next step
If you want to understand where your hospitality sites may have hidden slip risk, use the Slip Risk Scorecard to assess your current position and join an upcoming Slip Safety Services webinar to learn how measured grip can support a more proactive approach.
Frequently asked questions
Can a slip claim increase my business insurance premium?
It can, but there is no universal rule that a single slip claim will automatically increase your premium. Insurers assess risk using factors that can include claims history and the circumstances of the business. The effect will depend on the policy and insurer.
Do insurance companies look at slip and fall claims?
Claims can form part of the information considered when an insurer assesses a business’s risk. Liability insurance covers businesses against certain compensation claims arising from matters such as personal injury and property damage.
How can I reduce slip risk in a hotel or restaurant?
Start by identifying where slips or near misses occur and what conditions are present. Review contamination, footwear, cleaning, environmental conditions and the floor surface itself. Where appropriate, measure floor slip resistance rather than relying on visual inspection alone.
Do wet floor signs prevent slip claims?
Wet floor signs warn people about a potential hazard, but they do not remove poor floor grip. They should be part of a wider risk control approach that addresses the source of the slip risk.
Why should hospitality businesses measure floor grip?
Floor grip is not reliably visible. A floor can look clean and dry while still having inadequate slip resistance under particular conditions. Measuring provides objective information that can help facilities teams identify and manage floor-related risk.